sizes

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
♦
♦
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

sizes

Alex
The proposed sizes are:

small = x-767px

medium = 768-1199

big = 1200-x

Do you have an x size in mind for small? By x I mean a size we can not shrink beyond.

Originally I was thinking we can do small-medium-large designs separately but now I think it makes more sense to design them together. Ideally we want designs to have as much consistency as possible.

As an example apple seems to be 385:

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

fschmidt
Administrator
Alex K wrote
Do you have an x size in mind for small? By x I mean a size we can not shrink beyond.
320px
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

Alex
Okay closing.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

fschmidt
Administrator
In reply to this post by fschmidt
fschmidt wrote
Alex K wrote
Do you have an x size in mind for small? By x I mean a size we can not shrink beyond.
320px
Hugo, please confirm that this is okay.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

Hugo <Nabble>
Yes, this is okay.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

fschmidt
Administrator
In reply to this post by Alex
The question is what sizes should we support for responsiveness.  My current thinking is:

small < 800 <= medium < 1200 <= big

assigning to Peter for comment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

Peter
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

fschmidt
Administrator
done
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
♦
♦
|

Re: sizes

fschmidt
Administrator
closing