sizes

The proposed sizes are:

small = x-767px

medium = 768-1199

big = 1200-x

Do you have an x size in mind for small? By x I mean a size we can not shrink beyond.

Originally I was thinking we can do small-medium-large designs separately but now I think it makes more sense to design them together. Ideally we want designs to have as much consistency as possible.

As an example apple seems to be 385:

Alex K wrote

Do you have an x size in mind for small? By x I mean a size we can not shrink beyond.

320px

Okay closing.

fschmidt wrote

Alex K wrote

Do you have an x size in mind for small? By x I mean a size we can not shrink beyond.

320px

Hugo, please confirm that this is okay.

Yes, this is okay.

The question is what sizes should we support for responsiveness.  My current thinking is:

small < 800 <= medium < 1200 <= big

assigning to Peter for comment

Seems fine

On Wednesday, August 10, 2016, fschmidt [via Blasma] <[hidden email]> wrote:

The question is what sizes should we support for responsiveness.  My current thinking is:

small < 800 <= medium < 1200 <= big

assigning to Peter for comment

Woe to those who call bad good and good bad -- Isaiah 5:20

---

This topic is assigned to you at priority

2

View message @ http://www.blasma.com/sizes-tp308p404.html
NAML

done

closing